Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Malek Jaziri Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Almeida vs Jaziri analysis and find out who is favored!
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Malek Jaziri Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Almeida 1 - 0 Jaziri
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Almeida has won 48.67% of points on his second serve, while Jaziri has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Almeida, in recent form, has won 50.09% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jaziri has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Almeida has saved 63.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jaziri has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Almeida has won 46% of matches played (W/L 23/ 27), with Jaziri winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Almeida has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 154/ 103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Jaziri has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 248/ 182), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 18/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Almeida has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.65% of matches (W/L 21/ 25), where as Jaziri has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Almeida winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Almeida winning 2 and Jaziri winning 0. The last match between Almeida and Jaziri was at the Verona Challenger, 17-08-2021, First, Clay with Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Almeida and Jaziri have played a deciding set 0 times, with Almeida winning 0 times and Jaziri 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Almeida winning 0, and Jaziri 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Almeida has played against opponents with an average rank of 292.48 while Jaziri has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Almeida has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jaziri has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Almeida has converted 45.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jaziri has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Almeida 1 - 0 Jaziri
336
Rank
190
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
760
Rank
42
High
40
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
59% (176-122)
Career Total W/L
54% (574-489)
56% (10-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$57,890
Career Prize Money
$1,652,286
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | Malek Jaziri |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:27 | 1:30:27 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (36/51) | 52% (32/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (27/36) | 56% (18/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 38% (11/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (32/61) | 31% (16/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Malek Jaziri
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | Malek Jaziri |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (24/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (207/185) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:4 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 276.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (827/1337) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (556/827) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (244/510) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (59/122) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (539/1274) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
44
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Liam Draxl
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
41%
(
28 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Andrea Collarini
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Malek Jaziri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Malek Jaziri
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Malek Jaziri
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
43%
(
16 of
37)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taha Baadi
Player
Malek Jaziri
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Malek Jaziri
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
50%
(
67 of
133)
11
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
59 of
133)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Malek Jaziri
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alfredo Perez
Player
Malek Jaziri
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
39%
(
22 of
56)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Cozbinov
Player
Malek Jaziri
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
8
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Connor Farren
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
7
Aces
16
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan King
Player
Malek Jaziri
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Malek Jaziri
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
37%
(
20 of
54)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
89%
(
17 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Almeida Vs Jaziri Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
